Can Vitamin D Cause High Creatinine Levels

Can Vitamin D Cause High Creatinine Levels

Practice

Use of vitamin D drops leading to kidney failure in a 54-year-old man

CMAJ April 08, 2019 191 (14) E390-E394; DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180465

KEY POINTS

• Vitamin D toxicity is rare, but clinicians must be aware of the risks of vitamin D use to limit complications related to hypercalcemia.

• Calcium levels may get worse before getting better in patients even after cessation of supplements, as vitamin D is fat soluble.

• Observational data and expert opinion suggest that glucocorticoids, ketoconazole and hydroxychloroquine are reasonable options to treat hypercalcemia related to vitamin D toxicity by decreasing the "active" 1, 25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ levels.

A 54-year-old man was referred urgently to the nephrology clinic by his family physician for suspected acute kidney injury, with a creatinine level of 376 μmol/L. He had recently returned from a trip to Southeast Asia, where he had spent extensive periods sunbathing (6–8 h/d) for 2 weeks. His medical history included hypertension, dyslipidemia and gout, for which he was taking perindopril 8 mg daily, rosuvastatin 10 mg daily, amlodipine 10 mg daily, indapamide 2.5 mg daily and febuxostat 80 mg daily.

On his return to Canada, the patient's creatinine level had initially increased from his baseline of 100 μmol/L to 132 μmol/L. His family physician instructed him to discontinue his antihypertensive and diuretic agents temporarily on the premise that he had possible extracellular fluid depletion from the heat exposure. Despite this measure, on repeat measurement 4 weeks later, the patient's creatinine level had risen to 376 μmol/L. During this 4-week period, he had not used nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drugs or new medications, had not been exposed to intravenous contrast and had no acute illnesses. Given that his creatinine level continued to rise rapidly with no clear etiology, the patient was referred to nephrology.

The patient's family history included autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease, with 2 first-degree relatives requiring dialysis before age 60. However, he had undergone radiographic screening with abdominal ultrasonography, which was negative for polycystic kidneys.

At the nephrology clinic, the patient's blood pressure was 149/98 mm Hg, with no urgent clinical indications for dialysis. Renal ultrasonography showed normal-sized kidneys with no hydronephrosis or echogenicity. An incidental 1.2 cm bladder mass was seen on ultrasonography and was later diagnosed as noninvasive urothelial carcinoma. (This was treated with local excision with interval surveillance, requiring no chemotherapy.)

Urine studies at the patient's initial nephrology visit did not show leukocytes, erythrocytes or protein. There were no cellular casts or crystals seen on urine microscopy. Results of serum and urine protein electrophoresis studies were negative. Complete blood count was normal. However, the patient's serum calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels showed a non-PTH-mediated hypercalcemia (Box 1). Testing of 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ levels was ordered. Imaging studies of the chest and abdomen were unremarkable.

Box 1: Relevant serum laboratory values across the patient's initial and most recent clinic visits over a 10-month period, with hydroxychloroquine started after his second clinic visit*

Laboratory test	Visit no. 1	Visit no. 2	Visit no. 4	Visit no. 5	Visit no. 8	Visit no. 9	Normal range
Ionized calcium, mmol/L†	1.48	1.54	1.63	1.47	1.26	1.27	1.12–1.32
Calcium, mmol/L‡	3.04	3.21	3.28	2.87	2.57	2.57	2.20–2.62
Phosphate, mmol/L	0.95	0.94	1.05	0.89	0.78	0.73	0.80–1.40
PTH, ng/L	4.72	2.83	3.77	10.37	–	–	12.26–71.67
1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D3, pmol/L§	274	313	234	187	125	102	60–206
25-hydroxyvitamin D3, nmol/L§	241	186	152	135	96	108	25–200
Creatinine, μmol/L	372	241	271	237	199	186	64–110
Estimated GFR, mL/min/1.73m2	< 15	25	22	26	32	34 >	60

The differential diagnosis at this point included hypercalcemia of malignancy, multiple myeloma and granulomatous diseases, such as sarcoidosis. A renal biopsy showed features of nephrosclerosis and microcalcifications but with no features of sarcoidosis or light chain deposition (Figure 1).

On more detailed questioning, the patient mentioned that he was seeing a naturopathic specialist who had prescribed high doses of vitamin D, advising him to take 8 drops of a specific brand daily. He did not have a history of a fragility fracture or documented vitamin D deficiency. The recommended brand contained 500 IU per drop. Unknowingly, the patient obtained another vitamin D preparation that contained 1000 IU per drop. The patient was not counselled about toxicity risks and, over a period of 2.5 years, he took 8–12 drops of vitamin D daily, for a total daily dose of 8000–12 000 IU.

At the nephrology clinic, the patient's measured 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ level was 274 pmol/L and his 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ level was 241 nmol/L (Box 1). He was instructed to stop taking all vitamin D supplements and calcium-rich foods. His diuretics remained on hold, but one of his antihypertensive agents (amlodipine) was resumed after his second clinic visit. His 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ and ionized calcium levels continued to increase (Figure 2). His only new symptom related to hypercalcemia was pruritus.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Figure 2:

Serial 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ (25-OH D), 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ (1,25 OH D) and ionized calcium levels over a 10-month period. Ionized calcium and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ levels continued to rise 4 weeks after cessation of supplements. Hydroxychloroquine was started at the June clinic visit, and 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ levels steadily decreased after its initiation.

Given his worsening hypercalcemia and increased active vitamin D levels, we counselled the patient about starting glucocorticoid therapy. He was reluctant to start glucocorticoids, given concerns about potential weight gain. As an alternative, we offered oral hydroxychloroquine at 400 mg daily and counselled the patient on adverse effects, including retinal toxicity.

The patient's calcium and vitamin D levels decreased after initiation of hydroxychloroquine. Almost 1 year after diagnosis, his calcium and vitamin D levels have returned to normal, but he is left with stage 3B (estimated glomerular filtration rate 34 mL/min/1.73m³) chronic kidney disease.

Discussion

Historically, reports have outlined the benefits of vitamin D in relation to bone health.1 Other purported benefits of vitamin D included nonskeletal outcomes, such as cardiovascular benefit, fall prevention, and reduction of infections and malignancies.2 However, an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses did not show that vitamin D reduces primary fracture risk or convincingly improves other nonskeletal health outcomes.3 Furthermore, a recent review for the US Preventive Services Task Force showed no benefit of vitamin D in preventing primary fracture in those without known deficiency, osteoporosis or prior fracture.4

In its 2010 guideline, Osteoporosis Canada recommended vitamin D supplementation of 10–25 μg (400–1000 IU) for most low-risk adults under the age of 50 years to achieve serum levels of 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ greater than 75 nmol/L (level 3 evidence),1 arguing that the potential benefits outweigh risks. A daily vitamin D intake of 20–50 μg (800–2000 IU) is recommended for high-risk and older adults (level 2 evidence).1

Mechanism of vitamin D toxicity

Although vitamin D toxicity is rare owing to a large therapeutic range, its widespread availability in various over-the-counter formulations may pose a substantial risk to uninformed patients. After consumption, vitamin D is carried to the liver where it undergoes hydroxylation and is activated by either microsomal CYP2R1 or mitochondrial CYP27A1 to 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃.5^,6 The resulting 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ binds to the vitamin D binding protein and is carried to the kidneys for further 1α-hydroxylation by CYP27B1 to produce 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃.6 This 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ is transported to target cells and enters the nucleus of the vitamin D receptor, leading to an upregulation in gene expression. Although it is transported by vitamin D binding protein, 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ has a lower affinity to binding relative to 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ and its metabolites.5 A leading hypothesis suggests that an oversaturation of the vitamin D binding protein causes an increase in free active Vitamin D (1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃), resulting in hypercalcemia.

CYP24A1 plays an important role in the deactivation of 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ to calcitroic acid.6 CYP24A1 also breaks down precursor 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃ to 24,25-dihydroxyvitamin D₃. Loss-of-function mutations in CYP24A1 have been associated with hypercalcemia because of increased vitamin D sensitivity.6 Although we did not perform genetic testing on our patient, it is plausible that he had a CYP24A1 mutation, increasing his susceptibility to vitamin D toxicity.

Manifestations of toxicity

Toxicity can occur over a short period in patients ingesting large doses of vitamin D, either intentionally or inadvertently.7 The literature supports that doses greater than 10 000 IU per day for several months may lead to toxicity (> 200 nmol/L of 25-hydroxyvitamin D₃).8 However, differences in patient characteristics such as malabsorption and mutations in CYP24A1 can lead to substantial variation in doses required for toxicity to occur.

Patients may present with symptoms involving the central nervous system and gastrointestinal, genitourinary and cardiovascular systems. Central nervous system manifestations include lethargy, hypotonia, hyporeflexia, confusion and coma. Gastrointestinal symptoms include nausea, vomiting, pancreatitis and constipation; cardiovascular symptoms of toxicity, such as hypertension, arrhythmias and QT segment shortening, may also occur.9 Genitourinary symptoms include polyuria, nephrocalcinosis and renal failure. The symptomatology associated with vitamin D toxicity underscores the suggestion that hypercalcemia may be responsible for most symptoms seen.7 Sustained hypercalcemia can also lead to dysregulation of calcium–phosphate homeostasis leading to PTH suppression and impaired bone turnover.3^,5

Importantly, patients may be asymptomatic, delaying diagnosis, and abnormalities related to vitamin D toxicity may be detected only incidentally.

In terms of renal involvement, hypercalcemia can cause kidney injury both acutely and chronically. Hypercalcemia can cause acute kidney injury primarily by 2 mechanisms: afferent arteriolar constriction and intravascular volume depletion from a diuretic effect through activation of calcium-sensing receptor at the sodium–chloride cotransporter in the loop of Henle.10 Our patient's acute kidney injury was likely worsened by volume depletion from diuretic use, prolonged heat exposure and preexisting hypercalcemia from vitamin D toxicity. We saw some improvement in his renal function as his calcium levels decreased, by discontinuing his vitamin D supplements and temporarily holding his diuretics and antihypertensive agents. However, we believe that our patient developed chronic disease as shown by nephrosclerosis on renal biopsy (Figure 1).

Management of toxicity

In cases where vitamin D toxicity is suspected, patients should have their medications — prescribed and over-the-counter — carefully reviewed. Initial strategies to reduce vitamin D levels should focus on reducing dietary or supplementary sources. Although there is currently no evidence from large trials, observational data suggest that clinicians may consider strategies to reduce active vitamin D levels if hypercalcemia persists, through inhibition of 1α-hydroxylase activity (Figure 3).11^,12 If patients are asymptomatic, clinicians may choose to monitor levels expectantly, as vitamin D is very fat soluble and levels may take some time to return to normal.

• Download figure
• Open in new tab
• Download powerpoint

Figure 3:

Simplified pathway of vitamin D metabolism with a suggested approach to manage hypervitaminosis D. Key steps include the following: Limit sun exposure; Stop oral vitamin D supplements; Use medications such as corticosteroids, ketoconazole and hydroxychloroquine to block 1α-hydroxylase activity; Stop oral calcium supplements to reduce burden of hypercalcemia from hypervitaminosis D. Key enzymes involved in metabolism pathway are shown in green.5^–7^,11^,12

Image courtesy of Bottle credit: Creativology; Pills credit: BSGStudio

Several medications have been used successfully to treat hypercalcemia by reducing the active form of vitamin D. Glucocorticoids, ketoconazole and hydroxychloroquine have all been used in cases of hypercalcemia related to sarcoidosis.1^,9 Expert opinion suggests that these medications reduce 1α-hydroxylase activity and may be used to manage hypercalcemia by reducing 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ levels.11^,12 Given that our patient was reluctant to use glucocorticoid treatment, we used hydroxychloroquine as an alternative to decrease his 1,25 dihydroxyvitamin D₃ levels and, in turn, his calcium levels.

Our experience informs us that patients and clinicians should be better informed about the risks regarding the unfettered use of vitamin D. Given new findings from the US Preventive Services Task Force,4 current Canadian guidelines regarding its use in low-risk individuals should be revisited.

Patients with CYP24A1 mutations may be at an increased risk of vitamin D toxicity, and clinicians can consider genetic testing if vitamin D toxicity develops with doses less than 10 000 IU per day. Although vitamin D toxicity is rare, early recognition may prevent chronic complications related to hypercalcemia. In patients who are symptomatic, cessation of supplements along with treatment with glucocorticoids is suggested. In cases where glucocorticoid therapy is not preferred or is contraindicated, ketoconazole or hydroxychloroquine are reasonable alternatives.

The section Cases presents brief case reports that convey clear, practical lessons. Preference is given to common presentations of important rare conditions, and important unusual presentations of common problems. Articles start with a case presentation (500 words maximum), and a discussion of the underlying condition follows (1000 words maximum). Visual elements (e.g., tables of the differential diagnosis, clinical features or diagnostic approach) are encouraged. Consent from patients for publication of their story is a necessity. See information for authors at www.cmaj.ca.

Footnotes

• Competing interests: None declared.

• This article has been peer reviewed.

• The authors have obtained patient consent.

• Contributors: All authors participated in the conception, design, writing and revision of the article. All authors approved the final version of the manuscript to be published and agree to be accountable for all aspects of this work.

Can Vitamin D Cause High Creatinine Levels

Source: https://www.cmaj.ca/content/191/14/E390

Share: